When an accident occurs, determining who is responsible is not always straightforward. In many cases, multiple parties may share fault for an injury, which can impact the compensation a victim receives. Utah follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that even if you were partially responsible for your accident, you may still be eligible to recover damages depending on the percentage of fault assigned to you.
At Flickinger Boulton Robson Weeks, our experienced Utah personal injury lawyers help clients understand how comparative fault laws apply to their cases. Insurance companies often try to shift blame onto injury victims to reduce payouts, but we fight to ensure that your right to fair compensation is protected.
Whether you’ve been injured in a car accident, slip and fall, or another type of personal injury incident, knowing how Utah’s comparative fault law works is essential when pursuing a claim.
If you’ve been injured and are unsure how fault may affect your case, our legal team is here to provide the guidance you need. Contact Flickinger Boulton Robson Weeks today to discuss your case and learn how we can help maximize your compensation.
Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to determine fault in personal injury cases where multiple parties share responsibility for an accident.
Instead of barring compensation for victims who may have contributed to their injuries, comparative negligence allows courts to assign a percentage of fault to each party and adjust compensation accordingly. This system ensures that injury victims can still recover damages even if they were partially responsible for the accident.
Different types of comparative negligence laws are used in the United States, and Utah follows a modified comparative negligence rule.
Comparative negligence laws vary by state, and how fault is assigned can significantly impact a personal injury claim. The three main types of comparative negligence are:
Utah’s modified comparative negligence (50% rule) means that an injured party can only recover compensation if they are less than 50% at fault for the accident. Their percentage of responsibility reduces their total compensation.
For example:
Determining fault in a personal injury case requires strong evidence to show how much responsibility each party bears. Evidence used to establish fault may include:
Insurance companies often try to shift as much blame onto the victim as possible to reduce payouts. This makes legal representation critical for injury victims seeking fair compensation.
Comparative negligence impacts various types of personal injury cases, including:
If two drivers were speeding, both could share fault, affecting financial compensation.
A property owner may argue that the victim was distracted or ignored warning signs.
Employers may try to blame the worker’s actions for an accident.
Understanding comparative negligence is crucial for personal injury victims seeking compensation. Utah’s modified comparative negligence rule means that victims can recover damages as long as they are less than 50% at fault.
Since insurance companies often try to use comparative negligence to minimize payouts, working with an experienced Utah personal injury lawyer can help protect your rights and maximize your compensation.
Time is critical in personal injury cases, so don’t wait to get the legal help you need. Reach out to Flickinger Boulton Robson Weeks today and let us start building a strong case for your recovery.
Utah follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that when an accident occurs, the amount of compensation a victim can receive depends on their percentage of fault. This law plays a crucial role in personal injury claims because it determines how much an injured party can recover or if they are eligible for compensation at all.
Understanding how this law works can help victims protect their rights and avoid tactics that insurance companies use to reduce payouts.
Under Utah’s modified comparative fault law, an injured party can recover compensation only if they are less than 50% responsible for the accident. If they are found to be 50% or more at fault, they are barred from recovering any damages.
If the victim is partially responsible but less than 50% at fault, their compensation will be reduced by their percentage of fault.
When fault is assigned in a personal injury case, the total compensation a victim receives is reduced by their percentage of responsibility.
For example:
Insurance companies often try to take advantage of Utah’s comparative fault law by shifting as much blame onto the victim as possible. The more fault they can assign to the injured party, the less they must pay. Common tactics include:
In car accident cases, insurers may argue that the injured party was texting or not paying attention.
In slip-and-fall cases, insurers may claim the victim failed to notice a warning sign.
Insurance companies may try to argue that the victim’s injuries were not caused by the accident but rather by a prior medical condition.
To protect their claim, victims should avoid giving recorded statements to insurers, gather evidence immediately after an accident, and consult an attorney before accepting any settlement offer.
Comparative fault applies to various personal injury cases, including:
Multiple drivers may share blame if both were speeding or driving recklessly.
A property owner may argue that a victim was not paying attention to their surroundings.
A doctor may claim a patient’s actions contributed to a negative health outcome.
An employer may try to shift blame onto the worker for not following safety protocols.
Because Utah’s modified comparative fault law can significantly impact a personal injury claim, having an experienced lawyer is essential. An attorney can:
Utah’s modified comparative fault law directly affects how much compensation an injured victim can receive. If a victim is less than 50% responsible, their damages are reduced by their percentage of fault.
If, however, they are found to be 50% or more at fault, they cannot recover compensation. Because insurance companies often try to shift blame onto victims, working with an experienced Utah personal injury lawyer can help protect your rights and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.
Flickinger Boulton Robson Weeks serves clients from its offices in cities like Provo, Lehi, and South Jordan. The firm is dedicated to providing personalized legal representation, ensuring clients receive the attention and advocacy they deserve.
With a strong focus on achieving the best possible outcomes, their team leverages extensive experience in personal injury law to fight for fair compensation. Their commitment to client well-being is evident in their hands-on approach and unwavering dedication to justice.
Utah’s modified comparative fault law applies to various personal injury scenarios where both parties share some level of responsibility for an accident. Below are some unique examples illustrating how comparative fault could potentially impact a case.
A pedestrian is hit by a car while crossing the street. The driver was speeding, but the pedestrian was also jaywalking instead of using the designated crosswalk. A court may find the pedestrian 30% at fault for not following traffic laws, reducing their compensation accordingly.
A cyclist is struck by a car while riding at night without proper lights or reflective gear. Although the driver was distracted and ran a stop sign, the cyclist’s lack of visibility contributed to the accident. The court may assign 20% of the fault to the cyclist, reducing their compensation by that amount.
A person suffers an injury at a gym due to a malfunctioning weight machine. However, the injured party ignored safety instructions and improperly used the equipment. The gym may be partially liable for failing to maintain the equipment, but the injured party may also bear some fault for misusing it.
These examples show how fault can be shared, impacting the amount a victim may recover
In a Utah personal injury case, proving the other party’s liability is crucial for recovering compensation. Utah follows a modified comparative fault rule, meaning the injured party can only receive compensation if they are less than 50% at fault.
To establish liability, the plaintiff must present substantial evidence showing that the other party’s negligence caused the injury.
To prove liability, the injured party must demonstrate the following four elements:
Gathering strong evidence is essential to building a solid case. Important types of evidence include:
Proving liability under Utah law requires demonstrating that the other party’s negligence caused the injury and providing strong supporting evidence. Since insurance companies often dispute fault, working with an experienced Utah personal injury lawyer can help build a strong case and maximize compensation.
UTAH INJURY LAWYERS
Flickinger • Boulton
• Robson • Weeks
PROVO OFFICE
3000 N University Ave
Suite 300
Provo, UT 84604
SOUTH JORDAN OFFICE
10393 S. Temple Dr.
Suite 103
South Jordan, Utah 84095
OFFICE HOURS
Monday- Friday: 8AM-5PM
Saturday-Sunday: Closed
*Disclaimer: the information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a substitute for competent legal counsel.
**SMS consent and contact phone numbers will not be shared or sold to third parties or their affiliates for any purpose.
© 2025 All Rights Reserved.